Offer questions
Outcome tracking: questions answered
Which fields matter, what basic feedback is useful, and how criteria or volume can be adjusted.
← Return to Reporting that tells you whether to keep spendingA small, reliable outcome loop is more valuable than a large report your intake team cannot maintain.
01
Why outcomes change criteria
How post-delivery facts reveal patterns without treating screening as legal evaluation.
Why do you need our outcomes to improve screening?
Basic feedback on contact, consultation, and retention helps us adjust the criteria or volume if needed.
Which outcome fields do we need to return?
The smallest set your intake can reliably sustain: received, contacted, assessed, retained. The fields are agreed up front so reporting stays light enough to actually happen.
02
Running the feedback loop
The reporting burden, shared review, and minimum participation needed for honest evaluation.
How much reporting burden is this?
Deliberately small. A short set of fields on a cadence your team can sustain - not a daily report nobody reads.
Read the supporting answer →What happens at the shared review?
Received, contacted, assessed, and retained are reviewed together on a regular cadence, and criteria, pace, or market are adjusted where the data points somewhere specific.
What if we do not want to share outcomes?
Then this model is a poor fit, and it is better to establish that before launch. The channel cannot be evaluated honestly without them.
Read the supporting answer →Next step
Close the loop with fields intake will maintain.
Tell us what your system already records and choose the smallest reporting cadence your team can sustain.